Maths WorkshopMaths problems with full solutions
Exercise 2242Topology › Topology of Mn(ℝ) › Applications and the case n = 2M1Added 6 Nov 2026

No continuous square root on GL(2,R)

#square root#rotations#commutant#non-existence

Statement

Let GL2+(R)={A:det⁡A>0}GL_2^+(\mathbb{R})=\{A:\det A>0\}. Show that there is no continuous map S:GL2+(R)→GL2+(R)S:GL_2^+(\mathbb{R})\to GL_2^+(\mathbb{R}) with S(A)2=AS(A)^2=A for all AA.

Hint

Restrict SS to the rotations RθR_\theta, θ∈(0,2π)\theta\in(0,2\pi), and use that a matrix commuting with RθR_\theta (θ≠0,π\theta\ne0,\pi) has the form aI+bJaI+bJ, with J=Rπ/2J=R_{\pi/2}.

Show solutionHide solution

Solution

Idea. On the circle of rotations Rθ=cos⁡θ I+sin⁡θ JR_\theta=\cos\theta\,I+\sin\theta\,J, the square root must be ±eiθ/2\pm e^{i\theta/2}, and there is no way to choose the sign continuously all the way around the circle: this is the usual non-existence of a continuous square root of z∈S1z\in S^1.

Step 1: the commutant. Let θ∉πZ\theta\notin\pi\mathbb{Z}. If MM commutes with Rθ=cos⁡θ I+sin⁡θ JR_\theta=\cos\theta\,I+\sin\theta\,J then, as sin⁡θ≠0\sin\theta\ne0, MM commutes with J=(0−110)J=\begin{pmatrix}0&-1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}. Writing M=(abcd)M=\begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}, the relation MJ=JMMJ=JM gives MJ=(b−ad−c)MJ=\begin{pmatrix}b&-a\\d&-c\end{pmatrix} and JM=(−c−dab)JM=\begin{pmatrix}-c&-d\\a&b\end{pmatrix}, hence d=ad=a, c=−bc=-b. So M=aI−bJM=aI-bJ is of the form xI+yJxI+yJ, which we identify with the complex number x+iyx+iy (the map xI+yJ↦x+iyxI+yJ\mapsto x+iy is a ring isomorphism since J2=−IJ^2=-I). Under this identification Rθ=eiθR_\theta=e^{i\theta}.

Step 2: sign choices. Suppose SS exists. For θ∈(0,π)∪(π,2π)\theta\in(0,\pi)\cup(\pi,2\pi) the matrix S(Rθ)S(R_\theta) commutes with S(Rθ)2=RθS(R_\theta)^2=R_\theta, so it corresponds to a complex number zz with z2=eiθz^2=e^{i\theta}: z=ε(θ)eiθ/2z=\varepsilon(\theta)e^{i\theta/2}, ε(θ)∈{±1}\varepsilon(\theta)\in\{\pm1\}. Since SS is continuous and θ↦eiθ/2\theta\mapsto e^{i\theta/2} is continuous, ε\varepsilon is continuous with values in {±1}\{\pm1\}, hence constant on each of the two intervals: ε=ε1\varepsilon=\varepsilon_1 on (0,π)(0,\pi) and ε=ε2\varepsilon=\varepsilon_2 on (π,2π)(\pi,2\pi).

Step 3: across θ=π\theta=\pi. By continuity of SS at RπR_\pi, the limits of S(Rθ)S(R_\theta) as θ→π−\theta\to\pi^- and θ→π+\theta\to\pi^+ coincide. They are ε1eiπ/2=ε1i\varepsilon_1e^{i\pi/2}=\varepsilon_1i and ε2eiπ/2=ε2i\varepsilon_2e^{i\pi/2}=\varepsilon_2i. So ε1=ε2=:ε\varepsilon_1=\varepsilon_2=:\varepsilon.

Step 4: contradiction at θ=0≡2π\theta=0\equiv2\pi. As θ→0+\theta\to0^+, S(Rθ)→εe0=εIS(R_\theta)\to\varepsilon e^{0}=\varepsilon I. As θ→2π−\theta\to2\pi^-, S(Rθ)→εeiπ=−εIS(R_\theta)\to\varepsilon e^{i\pi}=-\varepsilon I. But Rθ→IR_\theta\to I in both cases, so by continuity of SS both limits must equal S(I)S(I): εI=−εI\varepsilon I=-\varepsilon I, which is absurd.

Remark. The obstruction is topological: GL2+(R)GL_2^+(\mathbb{R}) deformation retracts onto SO(2)≅S1SO(2)\cong S^1, which is not simply connected. On the simply connected set {A: A has no real negative eigenvalue}\{A:\ A\text{ has no real negative eigenvalue}\} a continuous principal square root does exist (given by a convergent series).

Lesson. Non-simply connected domains obstruct continuous choices of roots and logarithms.