Maths WorkshopMaths problems with full solutions
Exercise 1427Topology › Topology of Mn(ℝ) › Open, closed, interior, boundaryL3Added 7 Nov 2026

Countably many proper subspaces never cover M_n

#Baire category theorem#subspaces#covering

Statement

Show that Mn(R)M_n(\mathbb{R}) cannot be written as a union of finitely many proper subspaces, nor as a union of countably many proper subspaces.

Hint

Each proper subspace is closed with empty interior. Use the Baire category theorem (a non-empty complete metric space is not a countable union of closed nowhere dense sets).

Show solutionHide solution

Solution

Idea. Proper subspaces are "small" in the topological sense (closed nowhere dense); a complete space is "large" (Baire).

Step 1: proper subspaces are closed nowhere dense. By the earlier problem on subspaces, a proper subspace V⊊Mn(R)V\subsetneq M_n(\mathbb{R}) is closed with empty interior, i.e. nowhere dense.

Step 2: Mn(R)M_n(\mathbb{R}) is a complete metric space. It is isometric to Rn2\mathbb{R}^{n^2} with the Frobenius norm.

Step 3: Baire. Suppose Mn(R)=⋃k≥1VkM_n(\mathbb{R})=\bigcup_{k\ge1}V_k with each VkV_k a proper subspace. This is a countable union of closed nowhere dense sets covering a non-empty complete metric space, contradicting the Baire category theorem. The finite case is a special case (repeat the subspaces).

Elementary proof for finitely many. Suppose V1,…,VmV_1,\dots,V_m are proper subspaces covering M=Mn(R)M=M_n(\mathbb{R}), with mm minimal. Pick x∈V1x\in V_1 not in V2∪⋯∪VmV_2\cup\dots\cup V_m (it exists by minimality) and y∉V1y\notin V_1. For t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}, the points y+txy+tx are distinct for distinct tt; none lies in V1V_1 (else y∈V1y\in V_1 as tx∈V1tx\in V_1). Each of the infinitely many points y+txy+tx lies in some VjV_j with j≥2j\ge2, so one VjV_j contains two of them, y+txy+tx and y+t′xy+t'x, hence (t−t′)x∈Vj(t-t')x\in V_j and x∈Vjx\in V_j: contradiction.

Remark.
- The finite statement is a property of *infinite* fields: over F2\mathbb{F}_2 the space F22\mathbb{F}_2^2 is the union of the three lines through the origin.
- The countable statement is false in a non-complete space: Qn2\mathbb{Q}^{n^2} is a countable union of points.
- The example T={tr⁡∈Q}T=\{\operatorname{tr}\in\mathbb{Q}\} from the previous problem shows that a union of *countably many hyperplanes (affine ones)* can be dense without being everything.