The fewest kings controlling the board
Statement
A king controls its own square and the (up to ) squares adjacent to it, including diagonally. What is the minimal number of kings that can be placed on an chessboard so that every square is controlled?
Hint
For the lower bound, find many squares such that no single king can control two of them. For the upper bound, a king in the middle of a block controls the whole block.
Show solutionHide solution
Solution
Lower bound. Number rows and columns and look at the squares with both coordinates in . Two distinct such squares differ by at least in some coordinate. A king controls squares whose coordinates differ from its own by at most in each, so two squares it controls differ by at most in each coordinate. Hence no king controls two of the squares, and at least kings are needed.
Upper bound. Place kings on the squares with row and column in . A king in row controls rows (restricted to the board), so the kings in rows control rows , i.e. all rows; the same holds for columns. Every square is therefore controlled.
Answer. .
Remark. For an board the answer is by the same two arguments.
Lesson. To prove minimality, exhibit a set of "far apart" objects that each need their own resource.