Idea. Both Xk and Yk equal I+kA+B up to O(1/k2); raising to the k-th power, k errors of size 1/k2 add up to O(1/k)→0.
Step 1: ∥Xk−Yk∥≤C/k2. Write eM=I+M+r(M) with r(M)=∑m≥2Mm/m! and ∥r(M)∥≤2∥M∥2e∥M∥ (since ∑m≥2xm/m!≤2x2ex). Fix a=∥A∥, b=∥B∥ and let k≥1. Then
Xk=(I+kA+rA)(I+kB+rB)=I+kA+B+(k2AB+rA+rB+kArB+rAkB+rArB),
Yk=I+kA+B+r(kA+B),
with ∥rA∥≤2k2a2ea, ∥rB∥≤2k2b2eb, ∥r(kA+B)∥≤2k2(a+b)2ea+b. All the correction terms are bounded by C/k2 with C depending only on a,b. Hence ∥Xk−Yk∥≤C/k2.
Step 2: norms of Xk,Yk. ∥Xk∥≤ea/keb/k=e(a+b)/k and ∥Yk∥≤e∥A+B∥/k≤e(a+b)/k. So both are bounded by Mk=e(a+b)/k (for the operator norm, or up to the harmless constant ∥I∥).
Step 3: telescoping. The identity Xk−Yk=∑j=0k−1Xj(X−Y)Yk−1−j (check by expanding: consecutive terms cancel) gives
∥Xkk−Ykk∥≤j=0∑k−1∥Xk∥j∥Xk−Yk∥∥Yk∥k−1−j≤kMkk−1⋅k2C≤kCea+b.
(using Mkk−1≤Mkk=ea+b).
Conclusion. ∥(eA/keB/k)k−eA+B∥≤kCea+b→0.
Remark. The formula shows that although eAeB=eA+B in general, the products of "infinitesimal steps" recover eA+B. It is the mathematical core of Trotter-Kato splitting methods in numerical analysis and of the fact that the Lie algebra of a closed subgroup is a vector space (next problem).