Maths WorkshopMaths problems with full solutions
Exercise 2055Topology › Topology of Mn(ℝ) › Continuity of matrix mapsM1Added 7 Nov 2026

SO(2) has no continuous square root

#path lifting#SO(2)#square root#covering space

Statement

Show that there is no continuous map S:SO(2)→SO(2)S:SO(2)\to SO(2) with S(U)2=US(U)^2=U for all U∈SO(2)U\in SO(2).

Hint

Write Rθ=(cos⁡θ−sin⁡θsin⁡θcos⁡θ)R_\theta=\begin{pmatrix}\cos\theta&-\sin\theta\\\sin\theta&\cos\theta\end{pmatrix} and lift θ↦S(Rθ)\theta\mapsto S(R_\theta) to a continuous angle function.

Compare φ(2π)−φ(0)\varphi(2\pi)-\varphi(0) computed from S(U)2=US(U)^2=U and from R0=R2πR_0=R_{2\pi}.

Show solutionHide solution

Solution

Idea. A square root on SO(2)≅S1SO(2)\cong S^1 would be a continuous section of the doubling map z↦z2z\mapsto z^2; going once around the circle would give half a turn for the square root, which is not a closed loop.

Step 1: lifting. The map θ↦S(Rθ)\theta\mapsto S(R_\theta) is a continuous path [0,2π]→SO(2)[0,2\pi]\to SO(2). The map R→SO(2)\mathbb{R}\to SO(2), φ↦Rφ\varphi\mapsto R_\varphi is a covering map, so by the path-lifting theorem there is a *continuous* function φ:[0,2π]→R\varphi:[0,2\pi]\to\mathbb{R} with
S(Rθ)=Rφ(θ)for all θ∈[0,2π].S(R_\theta)=R_{\varphi(\theta)}\quad\text{for all }\theta\in[0,2\pi].
(Concretely: φ(θ)\varphi(\theta) is the polar angle of the first column of S(Rθ)S(R_\theta), followed continuously.)

Step 2: the equation. Since RaRb=Ra+bR_a R_b=R_{a+b}, S(Rθ)2=R2φ(θ)S(R_\theta)^2=R_{2\varphi(\theta)} and the equation S(U)2=US(U)^2=U reads R2φ(θ)=RθR_{2\varphi(\theta)}=R_\theta, i.e.
2φ(θ)−θ∈2πZfor all θ∈[0,2π].2\varphi(\theta)-\theta\in2\pi\mathbb{Z}\qquad\text{for all }\theta\in[0,2\pi].

Step 3: constancy. The function θ↦2φ(θ)−θ2π\theta\mapsto\frac{2\varphi(\theta)-\theta}{2\pi} is continuous and integer valued on the interval [0,2π][0,2\pi], hence constant, equal to some k∈Zk\in\mathbb{Z}. So φ(θ)=θ2+kπ\varphi(\theta)=\frac\theta2+k\pi and
φ(2π)−φ(0)=π.\varphi(2\pi)-\varphi(0)=\pi.

Step 4: contradiction. R2π=R0=IR_{2\pi}=R_0=I, so S(R2π)=S(R0)S(R_{2\pi})=S(R_0), i.e. Rφ(2π)=Rφ(0)R_{\varphi(2\pi)}=R_{\varphi(0)}, which forces φ(2π)−φ(0)∈2πZ\varphi(2\pi)-\varphi(0)\in2\pi\mathbb{Z}. But π∉2πZ\pi\notin2\pi\mathbb{Z}. Contradiction.

Remark.
- It is the same fact as the non-existence of a continuous branch of z\sqrt z on C∖{0}\mathbb{C}\setminus\{0\} or on the unit circle. Locally a continuous square root exists: e.g. on SO(2)∖{−I}SO(2)\setminus\{-I\} the Cayley transform of Problem 94 gives U=Rθ↦Rθ/2U=R_\theta\mapsto R_{\theta/2} for θ∈(−π,π)\theta\in(-\pi,\pi).
- The obstruction is topological: SO(2)SO(2) is not simply connected (π1=Z\pi_1=\mathbb{Z}). On the simply connected SU(2)SU(2) or on the contractible cone PD\mathrm{PD} (Problem 89) square roots do exist continuously.
- Combined with the principal square root on the PSD cone (Problem 89): the existence of a continuous square root depends on the domain.